Does Knowledge Create Ego in Humans?

Being selfish, the demonstration of enjoying exercises profiting one's self regularly to the detriment of others, is something everybody has been blameworthy of at some point. 

All things considered, a man's first intuition is constantly self-protection and mastery over those apparent to be weaker. One type of helplessness is the absence of information or knowledge, which is seen as a flaw should have been be corrected before effective incorporation into society.

Then again, one question that obliges a response to respects to regardless of whether there is a limit between knowing sufficient and knowing excessively broad measures of data; or whether the last classification exists by any means.

This prompts the fantastic's development 'know-it-all', somebody who trusts only they hold the responses to everything worth knowing, disregarding claims opposing to their perspectives.

Then again, individuals who are genuinely learned on a more extensive scale, grabbing valuable and intriguing data here and there, comprehend the universe's unfathomability and how irrelevant people truly are.

Having what is thought to be a significant level of comprehension in a subject frequently makes a man feel better than others, giving them a feeling of fulfillment when they are requested that clarify a point. Be that as it may, albeit having an one of a kind premium permits one to instruct others, the power received naturally inflates their egos, causing them to possibly becoming scornful of learners who grasp understanding at a slower pace than their counterparts. 

The daunting and mysterious nature of everything yet to be known humbles people instead, opening up their minds to accept more information and allowing their active participation in riveting debates with people who perceive the world in a different way. These scholars have the wisdom to avoid performing narcissistic and egotistical actions, marking them as different from the arrogant know-it-all.

Finally, we have the average person, neither a scholar hungry for knowledge nor someone who believes blindly in what they think they know. Needless to say, with knowledge comes power and the responsibility to look out for the people who cannot access higher education, which is usually costly and time-consuming. 

Although the absorption of greater amounts of information can have an impact on ego, whether positive or negative, the effects will be offset if people were to focus not on the status education grants them but on how they can use what they know to create a higher quality of life for both themselves and others.

The link between egotistical activities and knowledge is a difficult, and perhaps unnecessary, one to prove. They are not exclusively related, and many factors including the culture they were raised in, family dynamics, and the attitudes of their professors and teachers all play a role in dictating their use of knowledge, whether for self-gain or for the building of foundation for greater growth. 

In the end, with universal education attainment being indisputably an important goal to achieve in order to achieve equality and eliminate poverty, it all comes down to the individual and what they choose to do with the powers they are given.